Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology
Home About us Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Ahead Of Print Login 
Users Online: 194
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Ahead of Print

Role of real-time polymerase chain reaction in diagnosing Hepatitis E, the commonest cause of acute hepatitis in adult patients seeking institutional care


1 Regional Virology Lab, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
2 Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
3 Department of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
4 Regional Virology Lab; Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
5 Regional Virology Lab; Departments of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

Correspondence Address:
Debasis Biswas,
Department of Microbiology, Principal Investigator, Regional Virology Lab, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh - 462 020
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/ijpm.ijpm_693_22

Background: This cross-sectional study was performed with the aim of determining the prevalence of hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection among acute hepatitis patients attending a tertiary care teaching hospital in a developing country and to determine the relative performance of prevalent diagnostic assays in establishing its diagnosis. Materials and Methods: A total of 46 adult patients were included in this study, all of whom presented with jaundice of <4 weeks' duration and elevation of AST and ALT above 500 U/L. The prevalence of HEV among patients with acute hepatitis was calculated on the basis of the proportion of recruited patients reacting positively in serum anti-HEV immunoglobulin M (IgM) and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays. Results: Among the recruited patients, 11 (23.91%) and 15 (32.6%) patients were positive for anti-HEV IgM and RT-PCR, respectively. The two tests demonstrated poor inter-test agreement, thereby implying the necessity of performing both tests for reliable diagnosis of acute HEV virus infection. We also observed a significant difference in the duration of illness between RT-PCR positive and negative patients (P = 0.008). The mean (±SD) duration of illness in the two groups was 8.6 (±3.50) and 11.66 (± 5.15) days, respectively. Combining the results of IgM ELISA and RT-PCR, we observed that 23 out of 46 patients (50%) had evidence of acute HEV virus infection among our patients. Conclusion: Our study suggests that HEV is the commonest cause of acute hepatitis in adult patients attending a tertiary care teaching hospital and that the diagnostic algorithm for its confirmation should include both IgM ELISA and RT-PCR assays.


Print this article
Search
 Back
 
  Search Pubmed for
 
    -  Namdeo D
    -  Shrivastava P
    -  Garg G
    -  Vyas AK
    -  Nema RK
    -  Singhai A
    -  Nema S
    -  Biswas D
 Citation Manager
 Article Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed313    
    PDF Downloaded19    

Recommend this journal