Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology
Home About us Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Ahead Of Print Login 
Users Online: 9033
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size

    Article Cited by others


Evaluation of 100% rapid rescreening of cervical smears

Sood Neelam, Singh Vikas

Year : 2009| Volume: 52| Issue : 4 | Page no: 495-497

   This article has been cited by
1 Does 100% Rapid Review Improve Cervical Cancer Screening?
José Queiroz Filho,José Eleutério, Jr.,Ricardo Ney Cobucci,Janaina Cristiana de Oliveira Crispim,Paulo César Giraldo,Ana Katherine Gonçalves
Acta Cytologica. 2018; 62(3): 209
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
2 Internal Quality Control for Cervical Cytopathology: Comparison of Potential False-Negatives Detected at Rapid Prescreening and at 100% Rapid Review
Suelene Brito do Nascimento Tavares, Nádja L. Alves de Souza, Edna J.C. Manrique, Cinara Zago Silveira Ázara, Erika Aparecida da Silveira, Rita Goreti Amaral
Acta Cytologica. 2014; 58(5): 439
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
3 External Quality Control of Cervical Cytopathology: Interlaboratory Variability
Cinara Zago Silveira Ázara, Edna Joana Cláudio Manrique, Nádja Lindany Alves de Souza, Andryne Rego Rodrigues, Suelene Brito do Nascimento Tavares, Rita Goreti Amaral
Acta Cytologica. 2013; 57(6): 585
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
4 Analysis of the performance of 100% rapid review using an average time of 1 and 2 minutes according to the quality of cervical cytology specimens : The quality of cervical cytology specimens
E. J. C. Manrique, N. L. A. Souza, S. B. N. Tavares, Z. B. P. Albuquerque, L. C. Zeferino, R. G. Amaral
Cytopathology. 2010; : no
[HTML Full text]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]


Read this article