| 1 |
Does 100% Rapid Review Improve Cervical Cancer Screening? |
|
| | José Queiroz Filho,José Eleutério, Jr.,Ricardo Ney Cobucci,Janaina Cristiana de Oliveira Crispim,Paulo César Giraldo,Ana Katherine Gonçalves | | | Acta Cytologica. 2018; 62(3): 209 | | | [Pubmed] [Google Scholar] [DOI] | | | 2 |
Internal Quality Control for Cervical Cytopathology: Comparison of Potential False-Negatives Detected at Rapid Prescreening and at 100% Rapid Review |
|
| | Suelene Brito do Nascimento Tavares, Nádja L. Alves de Souza, Edna J.C. Manrique, Cinara Zago Silveira Ázara, Erika Aparecida da Silveira, Rita Goreti Amaral | | | Acta Cytologica. 2014; 58(5): 439 | | | [Pubmed] [Google Scholar] [DOI] | | | 3 |
External Quality Control of Cervical Cytopathology: Interlaboratory Variability |
|
| | Cinara Zago Silveira Ázara, Edna Joana Cláudio Manrique, Nádja Lindany Alves de Souza, Andryne Rego Rodrigues, Suelene Brito do Nascimento Tavares, Rita Goreti Amaral | | | Acta Cytologica. 2013; 57(6): 585 | | | [Pubmed] [Google Scholar] [DOI] | | | 4 |
Analysis of the performance of 100% rapid review using an average time of 1 and 2 minutes according to the quality of cervical cytology specimens : The quality of cervical cytology specimens |
|
| | E. J. C. Manrique, N. L. A. Souza, S. B. N. Tavares, Z. B. P. Albuquerque, L. C. Zeferino, R. G. Amaral | | | Cytopathology. 2010; : no | | | [HTML Full text] [Google Scholar] [DOI] | |
|
