LGCmain
Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology
Home About us Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Ahead Of Print Login 
Users Online: 1679
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
  Table of Contents    
REVIEW ARTICLE  
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 65  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 189-197
Focal cortical dysplasia: Updates


1 Department of Anatomic Pathology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João; Department of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto (FMUP), Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, Porto, Portugal
2 Department of Anatomic Pathology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto; Department of Anatomic Pathology, Hospital Pedro Hispano, Matosinhos, Portugal

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission18-Dec-2021
Date of Decision27-Jan-2022
Date of Acceptance30-Jan-2022
Date of Web Publication11-May-2022
 

   Abstract 


Focal cortical dysplasias (FCDs) represent the third most frequent cause of drug-resistant focal epilepsy in adults (after hippocampal sclerosis and tumours) submitted to surgery, and the most common in the pediatric age group. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification of focal cortical dysplasia is still a reference and consists of a three-tiered system: FCD type I refers to isolated abnormalities in cortical layering; FCD type II refers to cases with abnormalities in cortical architecture and dysmorphic neurons with or without balloon cells; and FCD type III refers to abnormalities in cortical layering associated with other lesions. Recent studies have demonstrated that somatic mutations occurring post-zygotically during embryonal development and leading to mosaicism, underlie most brain malformations. The molecular pathogenesis of FCD type II is associated with activation of the mTOR pathway. Pathogenic variants in this pathway are recognized in up to 63% of cases and may occur both through single activating variants in activators of the mTOR signaling pathway or double-hit inactivating variants in repressors of the signaling pathway. The newly described mild malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia in epilepsy, has been found to show recurrent pathogenic variants in SLC35A2 with mosaicism. The present review describes the lesions of FCD and discusses the molecular pathogenesis and proposal for a revised classification.

Keywords: Epilepsy, focal cortical dysplasia, genetics, malformations of cortical development, neuropathology

How to cite this article:
Pinheiro J, Honavar M. Focal cortical dysplasia: Updates. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2022;65, Suppl S1:189-97

How to cite this URL:
Pinheiro J, Honavar M. Focal cortical dysplasia: Updates. Indian J Pathol Microbiol [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 May 24];65, Suppl S1:189-97. Available from: https://www.ijpmonline.org/text.asp?2022/65/5/189/345053





   Introduction Top


Drug resistant epilepsy is a recognised clinical feature of a large number and variety of malformations of the brain and is frequently associated with developmental delay and neurological deficits. It is estimated that cerebral malformations are found in up to 40% of pathologically examined brain tissue of subjects with epilepsy.[1] Malformations arise from disturbance of the complex process of cerebral development during one or more of its three principal steps: cell proliferation in the periventricular germinal layer, neuronal migration using glial cell guides, and post-migration organization.[2] These steps overlap, with continued neural cell proliferation as migration occurs and migration continues with precision as neuronal organization takes place and connections are made.[3] This process may be disrupted by genetic abnormalities or by external influences, which include maternal diabetes, infections, alcohol, teratogenic drugs and toxins and irradiation or a combination of factors.[4]

Advances in neuroimaging have played an important role in recognizing the importance of cerebral malformations as a cause of seizure disorders.[5],[6] Furthermore, they have contributed significantly to understanding the underlying structural abnormalities responsible for the clinical picture.[7],[8],[9]

Malformations associated with chronic epilepsy are those of cerebral cortical development, involving neuronal and glial cells. Vascular malformations located in the cerebral hemispheres may also cause chronic epilepsy. The classification of these malformations from a pathological perspective has been based on the gross or microscopic location in the cerebral hemispheres, such as hemispheric, cortical, or heterotopic.[10] However, the classification most used currently in clinical and neuroradiological practise is based on the stage of neurodevelopment first disrupted, using pathological and neuroimaging characteristics and when available genetic information. It was first proposed in 1996 and has been updated in keeping with newer findings, using the broad framework below[7],[8],[11]:

Group I – Malformations secondary to abnormal neuronal and glial proliferation or apoptosis

Group II – Malformations due to abnormal cell migration

Group III – Malformations secondary to abnormal post-migrational development

The current classification includes almost all characterised cerebral cortical malformations and subtypes.[8]

As surgery became available as a therapeutic option for resectable causes of drug resistant chronic epilepsy, attention was drawn to localised abnormalities resulting from malformations of cortical development (MCD), which were termed focal cortical dysplasia (FCD). According to a large multi-center surgical series,[12] these lesions represented the third most frequent cause of drug-resistant focal epilepsy submitted to surgery, after hippocampal sclerosis and tumours, comprising up to 19.8% of cases. Moreover, it is the most common structural abnormality in pediatric age, representing 39.3% of resected lesions. In a recent series from a single tertiary care centre in India,[13] FCD was observed in 14.9% drug resistant epilepsy submitted to surgery, and was the predominant pathology in extratemporal epilepsy specimens, representing 29.1% of these cases.

The aim of this article is to review the histopathological classification of focal cortical dysplasia and present updates in our knowledge of the genetic and epigenetic origins of these focal malformations.


   Histopathological Classification of Focal Cortical Dysplasia Top


The term focal cortical dysplasia was initially introduced by Taylor et al.[14] in 1971, in a seminal paper describing the pathological findings in 10 lobectomy specimens of patients submitted to surgery for the treatment of chronic epilepsy. They described localized areas of disrupted normal cortical architecture associated with the presence of large bizarre (dysmorphic) neurons distributed throughout the affected cortex but sparing the first cortical layer and, in a subset of cases, “grotesque” balloon cells were described. A histological similarity was drawn to the tubers of tuberous sclerosis, but they lacked the other clinical stigmata of the disease, and additional histological differences, such as reduced cortical cellularity, subpial wheat-sheaf like glial bundles, calcifications, and cyst formation.[4]

Since this original paper, the improvements in imaging and electroencephalographic techniques in the assessment of patients with epilepsy, resections of drug-resistant epilepsy lesions have become increasingly more common.[15],[16],[17],[18] Consequently, a variety of other and more subtle abnormalities of cortical layering have been identified histologically and have been designated cortical dysplasia, and a variety of terms have been utilized for similar cortical abnormalities. Responding to the need for uniform nomenclature and histopathological diagnostic criteria, different classification schemes have been proposed,[19],[20],[21] based on the recognition of abnormalities of cortical architecture and the types of cells involved and their cytomorphology and location [Table 1].
Table 1: Comparison of the two most used classification systems for focal cortical dysplasia

Click here to view


In 2011, the ILAE assembled a task force to create a consensus on the histological classification of the focal cortical dysplasia.[21] A three tiered classification system was proposed, largely based on the classification previously published by Palmini et al.[20]

According to the 2011 ILAE classification, focal cortical dysplasia Type I is a malformation characterized by abnormal cortical layering, without evidence of dysmorphic neurons or balloon cells and is further subdivided in three subtypes [Figure 1]. FCD type Ia is characterized by the presence of multiple vertical microcolumns, each of eight or more neurons, most frequently in cortical layer 3 and resembling the radial columns formed during cortical development. FCD type Ib results from abnormal tangential composition of the neocortex resulting in absence of any recognizable layering that can affect the total thickness of the neocortex or may present with abnormalities restricted to layer 2 and/or layer 4. The combination of both variants is classified as FCD Type Ic. In addition, the dysplastic cortex may contain hypertrophic pyramidal neurons outside layer 5 or small immature neurons.
Figure 1: (a) Focal cortical dysplasia type Ia, with loss of cortical laminar architecture and featuring vertical microcolumns of neurons (NeuN, 40×). (b) Fragmented and poorly oriented specimen presenting scattered microcolumns of neurons, suggestive of a FCD type Ia (NeuN 40×). No other abnormality was encountered in the resection specimen

Click here to view


Focal cortical dysplasia Type II is a malformation presenting with loss of cortical lamination and specific cytologic abnormalities and is subdivided into FCD Type IIa with dysmorphic neurons and FCD Type IIb with dysmorphic neurons and balloon cells [Figure 2]. Dysmorphic neurons are defined as large neurons with abnormal morphology, nuclear enlargement, abnormalities in Nissl substance distribution and the accumulation of phosphorylated neurofilament protein. Balloon cells are large cells with abundant glassy eosinophilic cytoplasm and one or more eccentric nuclei; they are characterized by the accumulation of intermediate filaments in the cytoplasm. Co-expression of neural and glial markers has been demonstrated in both cell types, although more commonly in balloon cells.[22],[23],[24] They can be positive for vimentin, nestin, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilaments, and immature neuronal proteins MAP1 and MAP2 by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence. In both FCD type IIa and IIb, there is blurring of the gray/white matter junction, with prominent myelin pallor of the underlying white matter and heterotrohic neurons. Balloon cells extend deep into the white matter.
Figure 2: Focal cortical dysplasia type IIb (Taylor type). (a) Absence of cortical organization and pallor of subcortical white matter (A - LFB/-Nissl, 20×). (b) NeuN immunohistochemistry demonstrating large dysmorphic neurons and balloon cells scattered throughout the cortex (100×). (c) Large dysmorphic neurons (H&E, 400×). (d) Balloon cells (H&E, 200×). (e) Phosphorylated neurofilaments demonstrating dysmorphic neurons with coarse processes. (200×). (f) GFAP expression in balloon cells (400×); (g) Vimentin expression in balloon cells (400×)

Click here to view


Finally, focal cortical dysplasia Type III refers to cortical lamination abnormalities present in association with a principal lesion, usually adjacent to or affecting the same cortical area/lobe [Figure 3]. Four variants should be distinguished: FCD Type IIIa associated with hippocampal sclerosis; FCD Type IIIb associated with tumors; FCD Type IIIc associated with vascular malformations; and FCD Type IIId associated with any other principal lesion acquired during early life.
Figure 3: Focal cortical dysplasia type III. (a) Epilepsy associated paediatric type low grade glioma with cortex above (H&E. 20×); (b) Adjacent cortex of the same case shows altered architecture: hypoplasia and dyslamination with loss of six-layered structure (NeuN, 20×). (c) Focal cortical dysplasia type IIId in a patient with history of difficult delivery. The cortical ribbon is thin and lacks lamination other than a cellular deep layer (NeuN, 40×). (d) Focal cortical dysplasia type IIId at the periphery of a porencephalic cyst, composed of clusters of large neurons within the region of the cortical ribbon (NeuN, 40×)

Click here to view


The present classification relies only on histological features, both architectural and cytological and correct orientation of the cortex in the neuropathological preparations is essential. Fragmentation of the surgical specimen often represents a further challenge and may make an adequate diagnosis impossible, particularly in cases of FCD types I and FCD types III. Insufficient representation of cortex adjacent to other lesions of FCD type III, in the material submitted to neuropathology, further increases the difficulty. Additional stains, namely luxol fast blue/Nissl histochemistry and NeuN immunohistochemistry help to delineate details of cortical cytoarchitecture. Immunohistochemistry with antibodies to phosphorylated neurofilaments, GFAP and vimentin are useful to identify the dysmorphic neurons and balloon cells of FCD type II, synaptophysin to demonstrate synaptic plexi and Ki 67 for evidence of proliferative activity. There has been relatively little published on FCD types I and III since the ILAE classification in 2011 and a critical review published in 2018 questions whether FCD types Ib and Ic are true developmental entities and whether they occur as isolated lesions[25]; attention was drawn to the lack of reliable neurophysiological, imaging and neuropathological features or genetic markers for FCD type III.


   Mild Malformation of Cortical Development with Oligodendroglial Hyperplasia in Epilepsy Top


A new form of cortical malformation, with more subtle histological alterations, was described in 2017 by Schurr et al.,[26] and was termed mild malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia (MOGHE). The description was achieved on a review of epilepsy surgery specimens, suspected on imaging to be FCD, with histology previously called non-lesional. All the cases occurred in patients with early onset drug-resistant surgery originating in the frontal lobe.

On histology, a blurring of the gray-white matter junction was observed, with significantly increased numbers of oligodendrocytes in the deep cortex and subcortical white matter which showed decreased myelin staining density. Heterotopic neurons were seen in the subcortical white matter, but not deep white matter [Figure 4]. Unusually, the oligodendroglial cells demonstrated proliferative activity, as evaluated by Ki67 immunohistochemistry, a feature that appears to diminish with age. In contrast to previously described FCD, no significant abnormalities in cortical laminar architecture were present and dysmorphic neurons or balloon cells were not observed.[26],[27] Since the initial description, other case reports of the entity have been published, including two cases in the temporal lobe.[28]
Figure 4: Mild malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia (MOGHE). (a) Globally preserved cortical laminar architecture; note the presence of heterotopic neurons in the white matter (NeuN, 40×); (b) Increased cellularity in the subcortical white matter, due to hyperplasia of oligodendroglial cells (H&E, 40×). (c) Heterotopic neurons with normal morphology (arrows) in the white matter with increased cellularity (H&E, 200×). (d) Diffuse Olig2 expression in oligodendroglial cells (Olig2, 200×)

Click here to view


The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of MOGHE were described later,[27],[29] and were subdivided in two subtypes with a clear age dependent distribution. The subtype I occurred between 1.5 and 5.1 years (median 2.6 years) and showed increased laminar T2 and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) signal at the corticomedullary junction; the subtype II occurred between 3.4 and 20.7 years (median 14.1 years) and disclosed reduced corticomedullary differentiation because of increased signal of the adjacent white matter. These variable MRI findings were related to maturational processes between 3 and 6 years.


   Clues to the Molecular Origin of Focal Cortical Dysplasia Top


Prenatal cortical development is a complex process and includes: cell proliferation in the germinal zones; migration of cells to the cortex; and vertical and horizontal organization of cells within the cortex with the establishment of axonal and dendritic connections.[11] The vast majority of neurons are produced prenatally and retained for the entire lifespan. Most terminally differentiated neurons are not believed to undergo mitosis.[30]

Recent studies have demonstrated that somatic variants that arise post-zygotically underlie most brain malformations.[30],[31],[32],[33] These somatic brain mutations lead to mosaicism, a mixture of variant-positive and variant-negative cells, which may affect one or more tissue or cell type, depending on the timing and location of the mutational event. In this context, there is evidence that somatic mutations linked to focal cortical malformations must occur early during development, in cells that migrate during brain development, resulting from mutations in genes critical for neuronal migration.

Recent investigations have been focusing on the genetic and epigenetic changes of focal brain malformations, and distinct etiopathogenesis have been discovered for FCD type II, FCD type I, and MOGHE.


   Genetics of Focal Cortical Dysplasia Type II Top


An investigation by immunohistochemistry of Notch and WNT signaling pathways in FCD type IIb, both important in cell fate determination and differentiation and cell migration, demonstrated significant abnormalities suggesting a contribution to development of the morphological features of the disorder.[34]

Many of the histological features described in FCD type IIb are shared with cortical tubers of tuberous sclerosis and with hemimegalencephaly. Although clinically distinct conditions, the three disorders share features of cortical dyslamination, dysmorphic neurons, and balloon cells. Drawing on this similarity, previous attempts to demonstrate a genetic causal link between tuberous sclerosis and FCD by studying allelic loss in the two genes responsible for molecular basis of tuberous sclerosis, hamartin – TSC1 and tuberin – TSC2 failed to show conclusive evidence of such a link.[35],[36]

Focal cortical dysplasia is considered a sporadic disorder, but there does appear to be some evidence for genetic susceptibility with rare cases of familial FCD.[37],[38] In a report including two pairs of siblings with FCD type II, and one pair with FCD type II and hemimegalencephaly, two pedigrees in which there were first cousins with FCD and ganglioglioma and dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumour, respectively, it was suggested that these disorders might share molecular mechanisms.[38]

Recent molecular studies featuring targeted gene sequencing further highlight the possibility that FCD type IIb, tubers and hemimegalencephaly may share a common molecular pathogenesis through activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. The mTOR signaling pathway appears to have important roles in neuronal differentiation, migration, and myelination.[39],[40] MTOR hyperactivity is thought to interfere in brain cell growth, neuronal connectivity, and neuronal excitability.

To date, nine genes in the pathway have been associated with cases of focal cortical dysplasia type 2: AKT3, DEPDC5, MTOR, NPRL2, NPRL3, PIK3CA, RHEB, TSC1, and TSC2 [Figure 5].[33],[37],[41],[42],[43],[44],[45] It appears that two types of mutational events might explain the abnormal cell population in focal cortical dysplasia type II: (1) single activating variants in activators of the mTOR signaling pathway; (2) double-hit inactivating variants in repressors of the signaling pathway.
Figure 5: Schematic representation of the mTOR signaling pathway, representing the global diagnostic yield among HME and FCT type II, considering the percentage of patients carrying pathogenic variants of each gene according Baldassari et al. 2019.[43]

Click here to view


Most cases of focal cortical dysplasia type II and of hemimegalencephaly are associated with missense mutations in the mTOR gene or, more rarely, in other genes in the signaling pathway, namely AKT3, PIK3CA, or RHEB. Moreover, it has been further demonstrated by analysis of microdissected cells that both dysplastic neurons and balloon cells carry these pathogenic variants.[43],[46] As there is evidence that both FCD type II and hemimegalencephaly are mTORopathies, it has been suggested that they may represent a spectrum of the same disease.[33] The phenotypic variability may be related to the embryonic stage in which the postzygotic mutational event occurs. The earlier the somatic mutation occurs during brain development, the larger the mutational burden is likely to be and hence, the extent of the malformation, as in hemimegalencephaly. In contrast, FCD type II is restricted as a smaller number of cells carry the mutation and appears to be related to events later during brain development.[33]

Cortical tubers in tuberous sclerosis, on the other hand, are usually the result of double-hit inactivating variants in the mTOR repressors TSC1 and TSC2. However, somatic mutations in TSC1 and TSC2 have also been reported in cases of FCD type II.[43] More recently, germline variants in the mTOR pathway repressor gene DEPDC5 were also described in FCD type II.[37] For these mTOR repressors, a two-hit mutational mechanism (similar to the Knudson's two-hit model of tumorigenesis) is assumed to be necessary to get biallelic inactivation and cause focal cortical dysplasia. The somatic second event can occur by a missense single nucleotide mutation or by loss of heterozygosity (LOH). The latter mechanism of a second-hit event has been demonstrated in a patient with type II FCD and a germ-line variant of DEPDC5.[37],[43]

Current targeted gene sequencing studies have only revealed a molecular culprit in up to 63% of cases of FCD type II.[43] However, by immunohistochemistry, panel negative FCD type II also displayed strong expression of phospo-S6 immunostaining, a downstream marker of mTOR hyperactivity, suggesting that these “molecularly negative cases” are also mTORopathies, possibly associated with somatic variants in genes of the mTOR cascade in which the current molecular knowledge is insufficient to disclose their underlying genetic alteration.

Finally, no significant molecular differences have been found between the subtypes FCD types IIA and IIB. Similarly, no correlation has been demonstrated between the mutated genes and post-surgical outcome.[43] Probably other factors are more important in this context, such age of onset, disease extent, and location of the lesion.


   Genetics of Focal Cortical Dysplasia, Type I Top


FCD type I is a more challenging subject. The validity of the subtypes proposed by the ILAE in 2011 as lesions of developmental origin is being questioned, with FCD type Ia persisting as the only credible subtype.[25],[47] The fetal cortex exhibits radial microcolumnar architecture, from initiation of radial migration at 7–8 weeks' gestation until midgestation, and it has been proposed that FCD type Ia may be a maturational arrest of a physiological state of cortical plate in the first half of gestation.[48] The persistence of microcolumnar architecture is observed not only in FCD type Ia, but also in a more widespread distribution in a variety of genetic and metabolic diseases, including DiGeorge syndrome (22q11.2 deletion), tubers of tuberous sclerosis, and methylmalonic acidaemia. Additional support for a developmental origin of FCD Ia (and FCD II) is the presence of excessive neuronal heterotopia and their complex synaptic plexi in the U-fibre layer beneath the affected cortex.[49] On the other hand, it appears to be doubtful that FCD type Ib and FCD type Ic, are true malformations of cortical development and probably represent architectural disturbances arising as a consequence of ischemic or toxic encephalopathies, congenital infections, or other perinatal insults.[47]

No specific molecular markers/genetic mutations have as yet been consistently identified in FCD type I in targeted panel sequencing studies. Mutations have not been identified in any of the genes of the mTOR signaling pathway in FCD type I. Brain somatic mutations in the SLC35A2 gene (see section below) were demonstrated in fewer than 20% of cases of FCD type I and a single case of West syndrome with FCD type Ic.[45],[50] However, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methylation analysis was able to distinguish FCD type Ia from other FCD variants.[51]


   Genetics Of Moghe Top


Although this is a recently described entity, there are already important clues to their etiology. Recently, Bonduelle et al.,[52] performing gene panel sequencing in a single center cohort of 20 patients, identified inactivating somatic pathogenic variants in the SLC35A2 gene n 45% of cases (9/20), with mosaic rates from 4 to 52%. Moreover, using laser capture microdissection, the same study found evidence that both oligodendroglial and heterotopic neurons may be the carriers of these pathogenic variant.

Somatic pathogenic variants in SLC35A2 had been recognized previously, in cases of non-lesional focal epilepsy,[53] FCD type I[45],[50] and in cases of minor malformations of cortical development,[43] which from the published neuropathological description appear to be MOGHE.[43]

Germline variants of SLC35A2, occurring as de novo mutations, were also described in a very rare X-linked dominant form of congenital disorder of glycosylation type IIm (MIM #300896), primarily presenting with epileptic encephalopathy, seizures, severe psychomotor developmental delay, and delayed myelination.[54] SLC35A2 encodes an UDP-galactose from the cytosol into Golgi vesicles, where it serves as a glycosyl donor for the generation of glycans. N-glycosylation is a key post-translational process; modified glycan structures may affect protein folding, stability, and integration with other molecules. However, it remains to be further investigated how primary defects in glycosylation in neuroglia precursors can lead to the histopathological features of MOGHE.


   DNA-Methylation Based Classification of Cortical Malformation Top


Genome-wide array-based methylation profiling has been proving a valuable tool in the process of reviewing the classification of brain tumours, as recognized by the 2021 WHO classification of Central Nervous System Tumors.[51],[55] The application of the same methodology in the research of malformations in cortical development has been evaluated in a pair of studies, with promising results. A report by Kobow et al.[51] highlighted that differential hierarchical cluster analysis of DNA methylation was able to distinguish major FCD subtypes (Ia, IIa, and IIb) from epileptogenic cortex that did not demonstrate architectural abnormalities.

A more extensive study on the DNA-methylation-based classification of focal cortical malformations has been recently published.[55] A reference cohort of 239 tissue samples histopathologically classified as MCD was achieved, including 12 major entities. This was followed by a test cohort of 43 independent surgical samples from different epilepsy centers, all samples from the cohort were accurately assigned to their disease classes by the algorithm, including cases of FCD types I and II and of MOGHE. These data demonstrate the suitability of DNA methylation-based MCD classification across major histopathological entities amenable to epilepsy surgery and thus lead to an integrated diagnostic classification scheme for epilepsy-associated MCD.


   Future Directions Top


With the recent advances in the knowledge of focal cortical dysplasia, particularly with respect molecular information, the 2011 ILAE classification for focal cortical dysplasia was found wanting.[25] Moreover, significant interobserver variability in the classification of focal cortical dysplasia has been reported.[56] Although diagnostic criteria for FCD type II are more straightforward, the diagnoses of FCD types I and III and the classification and clinical relevance of mMCD remain challenging and the routine use of appropriate immunohistochemistry is recommended to establish diagnosis, by demonstrating alterations in cortical cytoarchitecture and abnormal cytomorphology. The current discussion also centres on how genetic findings should be incorporated to obtain a comprehensive, reliable, and integrative genotype–phenotype diagnosis of focal cortical dysplasia.[57] In addition to sequencing studies, the use of immunohistochemical markers of mTOR pathway activation (such as phospho-P70S6 kinase, S6 ribosomal protein, and Stat3) should be considered.[46] To address these, a panel of experts discussed these challenges, aiming to get consensus toward further refine the classification of focal cortical displasia[58] [Table 2]. The new classification scheme reintroduces the concept of mild malformations in cortical development of the classification of Palmini et al.,[20] with predominantly white matter lesions, where MOGHE is included. In addition, to respond to the absence of pathology in specimens resected in the clinical and radiological setting of FCD, the term “no FCD” has been introduced. Although the classification is still based of morphological features, it is recognized that a panel of immunohistochemical stains may increase the histopathological diagnostic accuracy and hence agreement in FCD classification. Moreover, adding the level of genetic findings to obtain a comprehensive, reliable, and integrative genotype–phenotype is also discussed but has not yet been incorporated into the new classification.
Table 2: New proposal of FCD classification scheme[58]

Click here to view


The surgical outcome of epilepsy surgery is still variable, and dependent on both clinical and pathological factors. In most recent series, overall seizure freedom (Engel class I) is achieved in 50% to 75%.[59],[60],[61] Positive prognostic indicators related to clinical parameters include lesser extent of disease, complete resection of the epileptogenic area, lower age at surgery, and shorter duration of epilepsy. It is known that more severe pathologic features are related to better outcome: patients with FCD type IIA or IIB have a higher chance to be seizure free after surgery, than patients with mMCD and FCD type I.[61],[62] In the case series of MOGHE, only a third of the patients became seizure free after surgery.[26]

In addition to improving criteria for diagnosis and understanding the pathogenesis of these lesions, the importance of identifying the causative genetic mutation is to open the path to new targeted therapy for these patients with poorly controlled epilepsy. The mTOR pathway can be pharmacologically targeted by rapamycin derivatives, such as everolimus. This pharmacological approach has been proven to be partially effective for seizure control in patients with tuberous sclerosis.[63] Currently, there are ongoing clinical trials evaluating the clinical efficacy of everolimus for seizure control in patients with focal cortical dysplasia type II and refractory seizures (NCT03198949).

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Allen KM, Walsh CA. Genes that regulate neuronal migration in the cerebral cortex. Epilepsy Res 1999;36:143-54.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Friede R. Gross and microscopic development of the central nervous system. In: Developmental Neuropathology. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag; 1989. p. 2-20.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Rakic P. Principles of neural cell migration. Experientia 1990;46:882-91.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Copp AJ, Harding BN. Neuronal migration disorders in humans and in mouse models - An overview. Epilepsy Res 1999;36:133-41.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Brodtkorb E, Nilsen G, Smevik O, Rinck PA. Epilepsy and anomalies of neuronal migration: MRI and clinical aspects. Acta Neurol Scand 1992;86:24-32.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Li LM, Fish DR, Sisodiya SM, Shorvon SD, Alsanjari N, Stevens JM. High resolution magnetic resonance imaging in adults with partial or secondary generalized epilepsy attending a tertiary referral unit. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1995;59:384-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Barkovich AJ, Kuzniecky RI, Jackson GD, Guerrini R, Dobyns WB. Classification system for malformations of cortical development: Update 2001. Neurology 2001;57:2168-78.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Barkovich AJ, Guerrini R, Kuzniecky RI, Jackson GD, Dobyns WB. A developmental and genetic classification for malformations of cortical development: Update 2012. Brain 2012;135:1348-69.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Severino M, Geraldo AF, Utz N, Tortora D, Pogledic I, Klonowski W, et al. Definitions and classification of malformations of cortical development: Practical guidelines. Brain 2020;143:2874-94.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Armstrong DD, Mizrahi EM. Pathologic basis of the symptomatic epilepsies in childhood. J Child Neurol 1998;13:361-71.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Barkovich AJ, Kuzniecky RI, Dobyns WB, Jackson GD, Becker LE, Evrard P. A classification scheme for malformations of cortical development. Neuropediatrics 1996;27:59-63.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Blumcke I, Spreafico R, Haaker G, Coras R, Kobow K, Bien CG, et al. Histopathological findings in brain tissue obtained during epilepsy surgery. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1648-56.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Poyuran R, Mahadevan A, Mhatre R, Arimappamagan A, Sinha S, Bharath RD, et al. Neuropathological spectrum of drug resistant epilepsy: 15-years-experience from a tertiary care centre. J Clin Neurosci 2021;91:226-36.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Taylor D, Falconer M, Bruton C, Corsellis J. Focal dysplasia of the cerebral cortex in epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat 1971;34:369-87.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Otsubo H, Hwang PA, Jay V, Becker LE, Hoffman HJ, Gilday D, et al. Focal cortical dysplasia in children with localization-related epilepsy: EEG, MRI, and SPECT findings. Pediatr Neurol 1993;9:101-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Hirabayashi S, Binnie CD, Janota I, Polkey CE. Surgical treatment of epilepsy due to cortical dysplasia: Clinical and eeg findings. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993;56:765-70.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Widdess-Walsh P, Diehl B, Najm I. Neuroimaging of focal cortical dysplasia. J Neuroimaging 2006;16:185-96.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Coelho VCM, Morita ME, Amorim BJ, Ramos CD, Yasuda CL, Tedeschi H, et al. Automated online quantification method for 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/CT improves detection of the epileptogenic zone in patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Front Neurol 2017;8:453. doi: 10.3389/fneur. 2017.00453.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Mischel P, Nguyen L, Vinters H. Cerebral cortical dysplasia associated with pediatric epilepsy. Review of neuropathologic features and proposal for a grading system. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1995;54:137-53.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Palmini A, Najm I, Avanzini G, Babb T, Guerrini R, Foldvary-Schaefer N, et al. Terminology and classification of the cortical dysplasias. Neurology 2004;62:2-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Blümcke I, Thom M, Aronica E, Armstrong DD, Vinters HV, Palmini A, et al. The clinicopathologic spectrum of focal cortical dysplasias: A consensus classification proposed by an ad hoc Task Force of the ILAE Diagnostic Methods Commission. Epilepsia 2011;52:158-74.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Crino PB, Trojanowski JQ, Eberwine J. Internexin, MAP1B, and nestin in cortical dysplasia as markers of developmental maturity. Acta Neuropathol 1997;93:619-27.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Tassi L, Pasquier B, Minotti L, Garbelli R, Kahane P, Benabid AL, et al. Cortical dysplasia: Electroclinical, imaging, and neuropathologic study of 13 patients. Epilepsia 2001;42:1112-23.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Englund C, Folkerth RD, Born D, Lacy JM, Hevner RF. Aberrant neuronal-glial differentiation in Taylor-type focal cortical dysplasia (type IIA/B). Acta Neuropathol 2005;109:519-33.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Najm IM, Sarnat HB, Blümcke I. Review: The international consensus classification of Focal Cortical Dysplasia – A critical update 2018. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2018;44:18-31.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Schurr J, Coras R, Rössler K, Pieper T, Kudernatsch M, Holthausen H, et al. Mild malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia in frontal lobe epilepsy: A new clinico-pathological entity. Brain Pathol 2017;27:26-35.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Verentzioti A, Blumcke I, Alexoudi A, Patrikelis P, Siatouni A, Korfias S, et al. Epileptic patient with mild malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia and epilepsy (MOGHE): A case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Neurol Med 2019;2019:1-5. doi: 10.1155/2019/9130780.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Garganis K, Kokkinos V, Zountsas B. Temporal lobe “ plus “ epilepsy associated with oligodendroglial hyperplasia (MOGHE). Acta Neurol Scand 2019;140:296-300.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Hartlieb T, Winkler P, Coras R, Pieper T, Holthausen H, Blümcke I, et al. Age-related MR characteristics in mild malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia and epilepsy (MOGHE). Epilepsy Behav 2019;91:68-74.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Ye Z, McQuillan L, Poduri A, Green TE, Matsumoto N, Mefford HC, et al. Somatic mutation: The hidden genetics of brain malformations and focal epilepsies. Epilepsy Res 2019;155. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres. 2019.106161.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Juric-sekhar G, Hevner RF. Malformations of cerebral cortex development: Molecules and mechanisms. Annu Rev Pathol 2019;14:293-318.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Blumcke I, Budday S, Poduri A, Lal D, Kobow K, Baulac S. Neocortical development and epilepsy: Insights from focal cortical dysplasia and brain tumours. Lancet Neurol 2021;20:943-55.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
D'Gama AM, Woodworth MB, Hossain AA, Bizzotto S, Hatem NE, LaCoursiere CM, et al. Somatic mutations activating the mTOR pathway in dorsal telencephalic progenitors cause a continuum of cortical dysplasias. Cell Rep 2017;21:3754-66.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Cotter D, Honavar M, Lovestone S, Raymond L, Kerwin R, Anderton B, et al. Disturbance of Notch-1 and Wnt signalling proteins in neuroglial balloon cells and abnormal large neurons in focal cortical dysplasia in human cortex. Acta Neuropathol 1999;98:465-72.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Wolf HK, Normann S, Green AJ, von Bakel I, Blümcke I, Pietsch T, et al. Tuberous sclerosis-like lesions in epileptogenic human neocortex lack allelic loss at the TSC1 and TSC2 regions. Acta Neuropathol 1996;93:93-6.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Vinters HV, Kerfoot C, Catania M, Emelin JK, Roper SN, Declue JE. Tuberous sclerosis-related gene expression in normal and dysplastic brain. Epilepsy Res 1998;32:12-23.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Baulac S, Ishida S, Marsan E, Miquel C, Biraben A, Nguyen DK, et al. Familial focal epilepsy with focal cortical dysplasia due to DEPDC5 mutations. Ann Neurol 2015;77:675-83.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Leventer RJ, Jansen FE, Mandelstam SA, Ho A, Mohamed I, Sarnat HB, et al. Is focal cortical dysplasia sporadic? Family evidence for genetic susceptibility. Epilepsia 2014;55:e22-6.  Back to cited text no. 38
    
39.
Curatolo P. Mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) in tuberous sclerosis complex-associated epilepsy. Pediatr Neurol 2015;52:281-9.  Back to cited text no. 39
    
40.
Lipton JO, Sahin M. The neurology of mTOR. Neuron 2014;84:275-91.  Back to cited text no. 40
    
41.
Lim JS, Kim W Il, Kang HC, Kim SH, Park AH, Park EK, et al. Brain somatic mutations in MTOR cause focal cortical dysplasia type II leading to intractable epilepsy. Nat Med 2015;21:395-400.  Back to cited text no. 41
    
42.
Weckhuysen S, Marsan E, Lambrecq V, Marchal C, Morin-Brureau M, An-Gourfinkel I, et al. Involvement of GATOR complex genes in familial focal epilepsies and focal cortical dysplasia. Epilepsia 2016;57:994-1003.  Back to cited text no. 42
    
43.
Baldassari S, Ribierre T, Marsan E, Adle-Biassette H, Ferrand-Sorbets S, Bulteau C, et al. Dissecting the genetic basis of focal cortical dysplasia: A large cohort study. Acta Neuropathol 2019;138:885-900.  Back to cited text no. 43
    
44.
Jansen LA, Mirzaa GM, Ishak GE, O'Roak BJ, Hiatt JB, Roden WH, et al. PI3K/AKT pathway mutations cause a spectrum of brain malformations from megalencephaly to focal cortical dysplasia. Brain 2015;138:1613-28.  Back to cited text no. 44
    
45.
Sim NS, Ko A, Kim WK, Kim SH, Kim JS, Shim KW, et al. Precise detection of low-level somatic mutation in resected epilepsy brain tissue. Acta Neuropathol 2019;138:901-12.  Back to cited text no. 45
    
46.
Kumari K, Sharma MC, Kakkar A, Malgulwar PB, Pathak P, Suri V, et al. mTOR pathway activation in focal cortical dysplasia. Ann Diagn Pathol 2020;46. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath. 2020.151523.  Back to cited text no. 46
    
47.
Coras R, Holthausen H, Sarnat HB. Focal cortical dysplasia type 1. Brain Pathol 2021;31. doi: 10.1111/bpa. 12964.  Back to cited text no. 47
    
48.
Sarnat HB, Flores-Sarnat L. Pediatric neurology radial microcolumnar cortical architecture: Maturational arrest or cortical dysplasia? Pediatr Neurol 2013;48:259-70.  Back to cited text no. 48
    
49.
Sarnat HB, Hader W, Flores-Sarnat L, Bello-Espinosa L. Synaptic plexi of U-fibre layer beneath focal cortical dysplasias: Role in epileptic networks. Clin Neuropathol 2018;37:262-76.  Back to cited text no. 49
    
50.
Miller KE, Koboldt DC, Schieffer KM, Bedrosian TA. Somatic SLC35A2 mosaicism correlates with clinical fi ndings in epilepsy brain tissue. Neurol Genet 2020;6:1-12.  Back to cited text no. 50
    
51.
Kobow K, Ziemann M, Kaipananickal H, Khurana I, Mühlebner A, Feucht M, et al. Genomic DNA methylation distinguishes subtypes of human focal cortical dysplasia. Epilepsia 2019;60:1091-103.  Back to cited text no. 51
    
52.
Bonduelle T, Hartlieb T, Baldassari S, Sim NS, Kim SH, Kang HC, et al. Frequent SLC35A2 brain mosaicism in mild malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia in epilepsy (MOGHE). Acta Neuropathol Commun 2021;9. doi: 10.1186/s40478-020-01085-3.  Back to cited text no. 52
    
53.
Winawer M, Griffin N, Samanamud J, Baugh EH, Rathakrishnan D, Ramalingam S, et al. Somatic SLC35A2 variants in the brain are associated with intractable neocortical epilepsy. Ann Neurol 2019;83:1133-46.  Back to cited text no. 53
    
54.
Ng BG, Sosicka P, Almannai M, Almannai M, Bacino CA, Barone R, Botto LD, et al. SLC35A2 - CDG: Functional characterization, expanded molecular, clinical, and biochemical phenotypes of 30 unreported Individuals. Hum Mutat 2019;40:908-25.  Back to cited text no. 54
    
55.
Jabari S, Kobow K, Pieper T, Hartlieb T, Kudernatsch M, Polster T, et al. DNA methylation-based classification of malformations of cortical development in the human brain. Acta Neuropathol 2022;143:93-104.  Back to cited text no. 55
    
56.
Chamberlain WA, Cohen ML, Gyure KA, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Perry A, Powell SZ, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility in focal cortical dysplasia (malformations of cortical development). Epilepsia 2009;50:2593-8.  Back to cited text no. 56
    
57.
Blumcke I, Cendes F, Miyata H, Thom M, Aronica E, Najm I. Toward a refined genotype–phenotype classification scheme for the international consensus classification of focal cortical dysplasia. Brain Pathol 2021;31:1-10.  Back to cited text no. 57
    
58.
Blümcke I, Coras R, Busch RM, Morita-Sherman M, Lal D, Prayson R, et al. Toward a better definition of focal cortical dysplasia: An iterative histopathological and genetic agreement trial. Epilepsia 2021;62:1416-28.  Back to cited text no. 58
    
59.
Lee SK, Kim D-W. Focal cortical dysplasia and epilepsy surgery. J Epilepsy Res 2013;3:43-7.  Back to cited text no. 59
    
60.
Fauser S, Essang C, Altenmüller DM, Staack AM, Steinhoff BJ, Strobl K, et al. Long-term seizure outcome in 211 patients with focal cortical dysplasia. Epilepsia 2015;56:66-76.  Back to cited text no. 60
    
61.
Choi SA, Kim SY, Kim H, Kim WJ, Kim H, Hwang H, et al. Surgical outcome and predictive factors of epilepsy surgery in pediatric isolated focal cortical dysplasia. Epilepsy Res 2018;139:54-9.  Back to cited text no. 61
    
62.
Veersema TJ, Swampillai B, Ferrier CH, van Eijsden P, Gosselaar PH, van Rijen PC, et al. Long-term seizure outcome after epilepsy surgery in patients with mild malformation of cortical development and focal cortical dysplasia. Epilepsia Open 2018;4:170-5.  Back to cited text no. 62
    
63.
Citraro R, Leo A, Constanti A, Russo E, De Sarro G. MTOR pathway inhibition as a new therapeutic strategy in epilepsy and epileptogenesis. Pharmacol Res 2016;107:333-43.  Back to cited text no. 63
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Mrinalini Honavar
Department of Anatomic Pathology, Hospital Pedro Hispano, Rua Dr. Eduardo Torres, 4464-513 Matosinhos
Portugal
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijpm.ijpm_1226_21

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Histopathologica...
    Mild Malformatio...
    Clues to the Mol...
    Genetics of Foca...
    Genetics of Foca...
   Genetics Of Moghe
    DNA-Methylation ...
   Future Directions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed146    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded9    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal