LGCmain
Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology
Home About us Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact e-Alerts Ahead Of Print Login 
Users Online: 163
Print this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size


 
  Table of Contents    
LETTER TO EDITOR  
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 64  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 866-867
Urothelial carcinoma with divergent differentiation in a horseshoe kidney


1 Department of Pathology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Urology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission01-May-2020
Date of Decision06-Jun-2020
Date of Acceptance07-Jul-2020
Date of Web Publication20-Oct-2021
 

How to cite this article:
Madhumitha B, Joseph LD, Archana B, Chandru T. Urothelial carcinoma with divergent differentiation in a horseshoe kidney. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2021;64:866-7

How to cite this URL:
Madhumitha B, Joseph LD, Archana B, Chandru T. Urothelial carcinoma with divergent differentiation in a horseshoe kidney. Indian J Pathol Microbiol [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Nov 27];64:866-7. Available from: https://www.ijpmonline.org/text.asp?2021/64/4/866/328559




Dear Editor,

Horse shoe kidney is the most common congenital renal fusion anomaly affecting 1 in 400 live births.[1] Tumors that arise here are associated with predisposing factors such as infection, stones and obstruction. Most common malignancy reported in the horse shoe kidney is renal cell carcinoma. Urothelial carcinoma usually arises in the renal pelvis. However, the same in the isthmus of a horseshoe kidney is a very uncommon finding. Moreover, most of the reported cases have a pure urothelial component, tumors with divergent differentiation is rarer. Of great clinical significance is the fact that diagnosis is made at advanced stages and problems may arise during surgery due to altered anatomy and aberrant blood supply. We report a case of a 60-year-old male with primary urothelial carcinoma with divergent differentiation, arising in a horse shoe kidney.

A 60-year-old male, known case of horse shoe kidney anomaly came with complaints of painless hematuria in the Urology outpatient department. The patient had a history of diabetes and systemic hypertension and was on regular medications. Laboratory data were within normal limits except for urinary analysis which revealed 20-30 Red Blood cells (RBC) per high power field. Urine for Cytology showed clusters of epithelial cells with nuclear atypia and pleomorphism [Figure 1]a and was reported as suspicious for malignancy. Renal ultrasound revealed a horse shoe kidney, but the lesion could not be picked up. CT urogram showed a horse shoe kidney with relatively well defined heterogeneously enhancing lesion in the isthmus with moderate perilesional and perinephric fat stranding [Figure 1]b. Prominent uniformly enhancing lymph nodes were noted in bilateral para-aortic, pre and retro caval regions. PET CT was done for evaluation of primary and metastatic workup, which revealed focal FDG avid lesion in the isthmus extending to bilateral lower poles and right mid pole [Figure 1]c suggesting possibly a malignancy. Open right nephrectomy was done and sent for histopathological examination. Gross examination of the specimen weighed 400 g and showed a tumor in the region of the isthmus extending to the upper pole measuring 8/5/4 cms, which was solid, firm and gray white in color [Figure 1]d. Microscopic examination of the tumor showed areas of classic urothelial carcinoma (pathological staging-pT3Nx), with urothelial component (20%), glandular differentiation (60%) and squamous differentiation (20%) [Figure 2]a, [Figure 2]b, [Figure 2]c, [Figure 2]d. Margins were involved by the tumor. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was done which showed positivity for GATA3, p63, vimentin and CK7 [Figure 3]a, [Figure 3]b, [Figure 3]c, [Figure 3]d. IHC for CK20 and PAX8 were negative. This pattern confirmed our diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma with divergent differentiation. The background kidney showed hypertensive arteriosclerosis in the blood vessels. Glomeruli appeared normal. The patient also underwent cystoscopy to rule out urothelial carcinoma in the bladder, which turned out to be negative. Post-operatively, serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen values were normal.
Figure 1: (a) Urine cytology showing clusters of atypical cells (H&E Χ 100). (b) CT image showing well defined lesion in the isthmus. (c) PET CT showing horse shoe kidney with FDG avid lesion seen in the isthmus. (d) Gross specimen showing an ill defined lesion extending from isthmus (of horse shoe kidney) to upper pole

Click here to view
Figure 2: H and E (a) showing papillary urothelial component (H&E Χ 10). (b) showing papillary urothelial component (H&E Χ 100). (c) glandular component (H&E Χ 40). (d) squamous component (H&E Χ 100)

Click here to view
Figure 3: Immunohistochemistry. (a) GATA 3-positive. (b) p63-positive. (c) CK7-positive. (d) Vimentin-positive

Click here to view


Subsequently the patient was subjected to post-operative chemotherapy in view of the margin positivity. He withstood 6 cycles of chemotherapy and currently is on follow-up since 6 months.

Tumors arising in a horse shoe kidney are relatively rare. Blackard et al. has described 72 cases of malignant tumors in a background of horse shoe kidney.[2] Tijani et al. reported a case of clear cell carcinoma in a horse shoe kidney.[3] The incidence of urothelial carcinoma in a horse shoe kidney is approximately 3 to 4 times than in a normal kidney, possibly the result of chronic obstruction, lithiasis and infection which are common predisposing factors in the horse shoe kidney. Frequently anomalous vascular supply creates an obstacle to renal pelvic drainage leading to stasis and calculus formation.[4]

In the index case, the patient had renal calculi which probably caused urinary stasis, chronic irritation and subsequent urothelial carcinoma.

Most urothelial tumors that arose in a horse shoe kidney had pure urothelial histology, only rare cases with divergent differentiation have been reported. Among those with divergent differentiation, squamous and glandular differentiation are the most common. Others such as trophoblastic differentiation, microcystic, micropapillary, lymphoepithelioma-like, plasmacytoid/signet ring cell/diffuse, sarcomatoid, giant cell, lipid-rich, clear cell (glycogen-rich) have also been described. Each differentiation has its own unique clinical, pathological and molecular features. Compared to pure high grade urothelial carcinomas, those with divergent differentiation were associated with aggressive disease.[5] Other tumors that are seen in a horseshoe kidney are carcinoid, clear cell variant of renal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. The anatomy of the isthmus and major blood vessels is complicated in patients with horse shoe kidney, thus posing a challenge to the surgeon.

Thus, urothelial carcinoma with divergent variation in a horseshoe kidney is associated with a higher stage, lympho-vascular and perineural invasion indicating a poor prognosis. Hence an extensive search for divergent differentiation in urothelial carcinoma should be done by the pathologist as these factors may be associated with adverse clinical outcomes and requires optimal planning for further management.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Mizusawa H, Komiyama I, Ueno Y, Maejima T, Kato H. Squamous cell carcinoma in the renal pelvis of a horseshoe kidney. Int J Urol 2004;11:782-4.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Blackard CE, Mellinger GT: Cancer in the horseshoe kidney. Arch Surg 1968;97:616-27.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Tijani KH, Ojewola RW, Orakwe DE, Oliyide AE. Renal cell carcinoma in a horseshoe kidney: Report of a rare disease. Niger Postgrad Med J 2016;23:232-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
4.
Isobe H, Shiozawa S, Horie S. Urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis and ureter associated with hydronephrosis in a patient with horseshoe kidney: A case report. Juntendo Medical Journal 2015;61:617-20.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Wasco MJ, Daignault S, Zhang Y, Kunju LP, Kinnaman M, Braun T, et al. Urothelial carcinoma with divergent histologic differentiation (mixed histologic features) predicts the presence of locally advanced bladder cancer when detected at transurethral resection. Urology 2007;70:69-74.  Back to cited text no. 5
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
B Archana
Department of Pathology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College, Porur, Chennai - 600 116, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/IJPM.IJPM_464_20

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References
    Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed218    
    Printed0    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded12    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal