|Year : 2014 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 564-573
|Granulosa cell tumor of testis: Clinicopathological correlation of a rare tumor
Swapnil Ulhas Rane1, Santosh Menon2, Sangeeta Desai2, Ganesh Bakshi3, Amit Joshi4
1 Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Pathology & Urology Disease Management Group, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
3 Department of Surgical Oncology & Urology Disease Management Group, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
4 Department of Medical Oncology & Urology Disease Management Group, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Click here for correspondence address and email
|Date of Web Publication||11-Oct-2014|
| Abstract|| |
Background: Granulosa cell tumor of testis is a rare tumor accounting for less than 4% of adult testicular tumors though they account for nearly 30% of childhood testicular tumors. Due to the rarity of these tumors, exact etiology, pathogenesis, prognostic factors and best treatment approach are not well known. The molecular events in pathogenesis of these stromal tumors have begun to unravel and these developments put forth a reasonable and scientific explanation for the association of these tumors with developmental anomalies like undescended testis. However, many questions remain unanswered. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of clinicopathological features of all Granulosa Cell Tumors of testis from our archives in addition to an extensive literature search using PUBMED with the key words "Granulosa Cell Tumor, testis". Results: We found six cases in our archives, two of which were of juvenile type and four of adult type. One out of these six cases presented with metastases. All cases underwent radical orchidectomy. Morphology and immunohistochemistry were classical in all cases and there was no diagnostic dilemma. Literature search revealed 63 cases of testicular Granulosa Cell Tumor in addition to highlighting the similarities in the biology and the dissimilarities in the clinical behavior as compared to ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumor. Conclusion: Testicular Granulosa Cell Tumor is a rare tumor, which although histologically similar to its ovarian counterpart, differs in clinical behavior. Further detailed investigations are needed to reveal the mystery behind the differing clinical behavior despite histological and immunohistochemical similarity between the testicular and ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumors.
Keywords: Testicular granulosa cell tumor, testicular sex cord stromal tumor, juvenile granulosa cell tumor, adult granulosa cell tumor
|How to cite this article:|
Rane SU, Menon S, Desai S, Bakshi G, Joshi A. Granulosa cell tumor of testis: Clinicopathological correlation of a rare tumor
. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2014;57:564-73
|How to cite this URL:|
Rane SU, Menon S, Desai S, Bakshi G, Joshi A. Granulosa cell tumor of testis: Clinicopathological correlation of a rare tumor
. Indian J Pathol Microbiol [serial online] 2014 [cited 2023 Nov 30];57:564-73. Available from: https://www.ijpmonline.org/text.asp?2014/57/4/564/142665
| Introduction|| |
Testicular tumors are common in all age groups, with germ cell tumors being the most common group. Sex cord stromal tumors are relatively rare accounting for approximately 3-4% of all testicular tumors occurring in adults, though they account for nearly 30% of testicular tumors in children and infants. Due to their rarity and similarity to the ovarian sex cord stromal tumors, the terminology of adult sex cord stromal tumors is the same as that used in ovarian counterparts. However, testicular Granulosa Cell Tumors are rare tumors and hence management issues and prognostic factors are not completely understood with current nomenclature, understanding and management strategies being extrapolations from their ovarian counterparts.
| Aims|| |
The aim of our study was to attempt a clinicopathologic correlation of all published cases of testicular Granulosa Cell Tumor in addition to our own archived cases.
| Materials and Methods|| |
We searched our archives for testicular Granulosa Cell Tumors, in addition to performing a literature search in PUBMED using the keywords, "Granulosa Cell Tumor, Testis". Archived histology and immunohistochemistry slides were reviewed, clinicopathologic features were reviewed, tabulated and compared. Continuous variables like age of patient, tumor size etc were reported as mean ( ±SD). All published cases of testicular Granulosa Cell Tumor in English literature were also reviewed for clinicopathologic features. In addition studies comparing testicular and ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumors were analyzed.
| Results|| |
To the best of our knowledge, only 63 cases of granulosa cell tumor of testis are reported in the English literature (including the present series), 40 of adult type and 23 of juvenile type. In this report, we present one of the largest case series from a single institute comprising six cases of testicular granulosa cell tumors from our pathology archives collected over a period of 10 years accounting for 0.29 % of all testicular tumors at our institute (a tertiary cancer-care institute), along with a review of literature regarding their clinicopathological prognostic factors.
Detailed clinicopathological characteristics of our six cases are presented in [Table 1]. Briefly, there were two cases of juvenile granulosa cell tumors and four cases of adult granulosa cell tumors. All the four adult granulosa cell tumors and one of the juvenile granulosa cell tumor were present in adults (4 th and 5 th decade, mean ± SD age 39.5 ±7.55). One case of juvenile granulosa cell tumor was present in a 2-year-old child. All cases presented with mass in scrotum of 3 months to 2 years duration. None of the cases had elevated serum levels of α-fetoprotein levels. One patient (CC6) had elevated β-HCG and LDH. This was ascribed to a co-existent widely metastatic embryonal carcinoma, which did not have any demonstrable origin in either of the two testes. Left and right testes were equally affected. All cases underwent high inguinal orchidectomy. One patient (CC2) received adjuvant chemotherapy for metastatic disease at presentation. Specimens were received in three of these six patients, who were operated at our institution. Remaining three patients were operated outside and paraffin blocks were referred to our institute. Preoperative radiology was available in 3/4 adult granulosa cell tumor cases and revealed the tumors to be multicystic with intervening solid areas in two cases and completely solid in one case. Mean ( ± SD) tumor size of the non-metastatic cases was 4.33 ± 2.57 cm, while the sole metastatic case had a tumor of 11 cm maximum dimension.
| Discussion|| |
Detailed review of clinicopathological features of all the reported cases is shown in [Table 2].
|Table 2: Review of all testicular granulosa cell tumors reported till date|
Click here to view
Though both the types of granulosa cell tumors can occur at any age, the adult type tends to occur in adults with a mean age of 44 yrs at presentation, while the juvenile type occurs in children, accounting for nearly 6% of prepubertal testicular tumors and is the most common testicular tumor present at birth. There is a reported slight predilection for the juvenile type to occur in the left testis.  However, in our experience and review, the predilection is minimal (20 rt. testis vs. 24 lt. testis among the cases with reported laterality). The clinical presentation depends on the type of granulosa cell tumor in question.
Juvenile granulosa cell tumor presents as either painless scrotal or abdominal mass and is associated with ambiguous genitalia in 20% cases and contralateral undescended testis in 30% cases. All such cases tend to have chromosomal anomalies with 45/46XY mosaicism or anomalies of chromosome Y. They do not produce any demonstrable hormonal effects in most cases.
Adult granulosa cell tumors on the other hand present as a slowly increasing painless scrotal mass with gynecomastia being present in approximately 25% of cases. Most of them are not associated with any chromosomal anomalies.
Grossly, tumors are yellowish and can be either solid or multicystic with the adult type of tumors being commonly solid with only small cystic areas if present, while juvenile granulosa cell tumors are grossly multicystic. AGCT at presentation, range in size from 0.5 to 13 cm with an average of 5 cm, while the JGCT are relatively smaller at presentation (0.5 to 5 cm). However, this apparent difference in size at presentation could be due to the early detection within the pediatric population in which JGCTs are common, as compared to the AGCT, which would be clinically symptomatic only after it reaches a considerable size to replace the adult testis.
Histologically, a variety of patterns is seen in both the histological types, with microfollicular and diffuse patterns being the most common. Other patterns seen are trabecular [Figure 1]a, macrofollicular, gyriform and pseudosarcomatous. A microfollicular pattern is relatively common in the adult type while the JGCTs harbor macrofollicular patterns more frequently. Nuclear features are characteristically different in both types of tumor. AGCT have monomorphic, oval, grooved, coffee-bean shaped nuclei with bland chromatin without any mitoses [Figure 1]b, while the JGCT tend to have round nuclei without significant grooving. Mitoses are common in JGCT with many cases having abundant mitoses. Most tumors are well circumscribed and at times can be enucleated; the presence of invasive margins predicts an aggressive course.
|Figure 1: Panel of representative photomicrographs showing (a) trabecular histological pattern (Hand E stain, 100× original magnification). (b) Nuclear grooves giving a coffee-bean appearance is a characteristic feature of adult granulosa cell tumors (H and E stain, 400× original magnification). (c) Presence of necrosis (*) is a feature strongly associated with malignant behavior. (H and E stain, 200× original magnification). (d) Inhibin and (e) MIC2 positivity are common markers of sex cord stromal tumors in general|
Click here to view
Most of the tumors stain for the pan-sex cord stromal markers [Table 3], namely Inhibin [Figure 1]d, vimentin and calretinin. Among all the cases reported in literature, inhibin (25/26), vimentin (10/10), calretinin (10/11), MIC2 (7/10) [Figure 1]e and smooth muscle actin (6/9) are most common positive markers reported. Other positive markers include S100 (3/9), CK (6/14), EMA (2/13) and WT1 (1/1). Markers which are absent and thus helpful in the differential diagnosis include desmin (0/8), D2-40 (0/1), α-fetoprotein (0/13), β-HCG (0/3), PLAP (0/3), CD117 (0/4), CD30 (0/3), synaptophysin (0/1) and chromogranin (0/1).
|Table 3: Immunohistochemical profile of all testicular granulosa cell tumors reported in the literature|
Click here to view
Correlation of pathology features with clinical behavior and predictors of malignancy
Metastasis has been reported in adult granulosa cell tumors in ~20% of cases. , The tumors metastasize commonly to retroperitoneal lymph nodes with isolated cases of bone  and lung  metastases been reported. Irrespective of the reported frequencies, certain features predict metastases. Pathological factors favoring poor prognosis include large tumor size (>5cm), presence of necrosis [Figure 1]c, hemorrhage, vascular invasion and invasion into adjacent testis, rete testis or tunica albuginea. The only consistent feature that predicts malignancy is tumor size more than 5 cm. The size of the malignant tumors reported in the literature averages 69.6 ±15.6 mm as compared to the benign tumors which average 35.2 ± 4.6 mm. This is noted even in our series, where the only malignant adult granulosa cell tumor measured 11 cm in greatest dimension. The cases that do not satisfy these criteria for malignancy have not recurred or metastasized.
Unlike adult granulosa cell tumors, the presence of invasive borders infiltrating into adjacent testis does not appear to predict malignancy for the JGCTs, and no reported cases have had any recurrences or metastases.  None of the reported juvenile granulosa cell tumors in testis has been shown to be malignant.
Etiology, histogenesis and molecular pathology
The exact etiology of both the varieties of granulosa cell tumors of testis is unknown. The association with undescended testis and concentration of JGCT in the perinatal age group suggests the occurrence of an occult genetic event during intra-uterine development. Chromosomal anomalies involving the sex chromosomes, commonly the Y chromosome, have been reported frequently in juvenile granulosa cell tumors. , No such chromosomal anomaly has been documented in the adult variety. Recently, nearly all AGCTs in women have been demonstrated to harbor a unique and specific mutation within the FOXL2 gene. ,,,,,,,,, This mutation, namely 402C ; G (C134W), is proven to result in increased induction of the target aromatase, reduce apoptosis ,, and cause alterations in cell cycle. ,
Since its demonstration in ovarian AGCTs, this particular mutation (402C ; G) has been demonstrated in testicular AGCTs as well, albeit in a smaller proportion of cases (2/5, 40%).  The role of the FOXL2 gene in the pathogenesis of granulosa cell tumor was suggested by Kalfa et al.,  who were the first to show nuclear expression of FOXL2 in testicular juvenile granulosa cell tumors much like the normal ovarian granulosa cells and juvenile granulosa cell tumors of ovary. They also showed cytoplasmic sequestration of the SOX9 protein, which otherwise shows nuclear expression in normal developing testis. The role of both SOX9 and FOXL2 genes in the gonadal development has been extensively studied in mouse models. SOX9 is one of the foremost genes activated in mammalian male gonad, where it is essential and at the same time sufficient to induce testicular development.  In the undifferentiated gonad, the SOX9 protein is sequestered in the cytoplasm and nuclear localization is noted only after commitment toward testicular differentiation,  while the SOX9 gene is down regulated in the event of ovarian differentiation.  Kalfa et al.  thus hypothesized that the aberrant cytoplasmic expression of SOX9 and nuclear expression of FOXL2 suggest transdifferentiation of Sertoli cells toward granulosa cells. However, we believe that this could also be explained by a much simpler explanation that granulosa cell tumor arose within the remnants of the undifferentiated gonads within the testis. In another experiment using mouse models, all Smad1 Smad5 double knock out and Smad1 Smad5 Smad8 (part of the TGF-β pathway) triple knockout female mice developed granulosa cell tumors while male knockout mice developed Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors. 
Overall, the evidence outlining the etiology and molecular pathogenesis of testicular granulosa cell tumors is still in its early stages; however, the hypothesis of SOX9 and FOXL2 dysregulation in the pathogenesis of granulosa cell tumors seems promising.
Traditionally, high inguinal orchidectomy has been performed for all granulosa cell tumors, since there are no clinical or radiological criteria to predict the histology or to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors in tumors confined to the testis. However, in a retrospective analysis, one patient having undergone testis sparing enucleation for JGCT has shown no recurrence or progression at the end of 5 years with the authors recommending the procedure for small tumors.  Similarly, enucleation was a definite treatment option for small sex cord stromal tumors including granulosa cell tumors within the Italian TREP project.  Apart from size, Valla et al., as well as Bullota et al.,  proposed that absence of raised AFP and/or β-HCG be used as an additional criterion to select patients for testicular sparing surgery amongst the patients with small tumors as it effectively rules out yolk sack tumors and teratomas which are by far the most common tumors in the testis.
| Conclusion|| |
Testicular granulosa cell tumors are rare tumors usually presenting as a mass in the testis. Dysregulation of SOX9 and FOXL2 genes as a cause of granulosa cell tumors seems to be a promising target for further study. Metastasis is an uncommon event in these tumors and virtually absent from the set of juvenile granulosa cell tumors. Though most cases have undergone radical orchidectomy, there is compelling evidence to suggest that testicular sparing surgery is a viable option in cases without any evidence of metastases at presentation, normal levels of serum tumor markers (AFP, B-HCG, LDH) and small tumors especially for the juvenile type.
| References|| |
Nieto N, Torres-Valdivieso MJ, Aguado P, Mateos ME, Lopez-Perez J, Melero C, et al
. Juvenile granulosa cell tumor of the testis: Case report and review of literature. Tumori 2002;88:72-4.
Suppiah A, Musa MM, Morgan DR, North AD. Adult granulosa cell tumour of the testis and bony metastasis. A report of the first case of granulosa cell tumour of the testicle metastasising to bone. Urol Int 2005;75:91-3.
Jimenez-Quintero LP, Ro JY, Zavala-Pompa A, Amin MB, Tetu B, Ordonez NG, et al
. Granulosa cell tumor of the adult testis: A clinicopathologic study of seven cases and a review of the literature. Hum Pathol 1993;24:1120-5.
Hammerich KH, Hille S, Ayala GE, Wheeler TM, Engers R, Ackermann R, et al
. Malignant advanced granulosa cell tumor of the adult testis: Case report and review of the literature. Hum Pathol 2008;39:701-9.
Harms D, Kock LR. Testicular juvenile granulosa cell and Sertoli cell tumours: A clinicopathological study of 29 cases from the Kiel Paediatric Tumour Registry. Virchows Arch 1997;430:301-9.
Chan JK, Chan VS, Mak KL. Congenital juvenile granulosa cell tumour of the testis: Report of a case showing extensive degenerative changes. Histopathology 1990;17:75-80.
Kos M, Nogales FF, Kos M, Stipoljev F, Kunjko K. Congenital juvenile granulosa cell tumor of the testis in a fetus showing full 69, XXY triploidy. Int J Surg Pathol 2005;13:219-21.
Benayoun BA, Caburet S, Dipietromaria A, Georges A, D'Haene B, Pandaranayaka PJ, et al
. Functional exploration of the adult ovarian granulosa cell tumor-associated somatic FOXL2 mutation p.Cys134Trp (c.402C>G). PloS One 2010;5:e8789.
Schrader KA, Gorbatcheva B, Senz J, Heravi-Moussavi A, Melnyk N, Salamanca C, et al
. The specificity of the FOXL2 c.402C>G somatic mutation: A survey of solid tumors. PloS One 2009;4:e7988.
Jamieson S, Butzow R, Andersson N, Alexiadis M, Unkila-Kallio L, Heikinheimo M, et al
. The FOXL2 C134W mutation is characteristic of adult granulosa cell tumors of the ovary. Mod Pathol 2010;23:1477-85.
Kim JH, Yoon S, Park M, Park HO, Ko JJ, Lee K, et al
. Differential apoptotic activities of wild-type FOXL2 and the adult-type granulosa cell tumor-associated mutant FOXL2 (C134W). Oncogene 2011;30:1653-63.
Kim MS, Hur SY, Yoo NJ, Lee SH. Mutational analysis of FOXL2 codon 134 in granulosa cell tumour of ovary and other human cancers. J Pathol 2010;221:147-52.
Hes O, Vanecek T, Petersson F, Grossmann P, Hora M, Perez Montiel DM, et al
. Mutational analysis (c.402C>G) of the FOXL2 gene and immunohistochemical expression of the FOXL2 protein in testicular adult type granulosa cell tumors and incompletely differentiated sex cord stromal tumors. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2011;19:347-51.
Al-Agha OM, Huwait HF, Chow C, Yang W, Senz J, Kalloger SE, et al
. FOXL2 is a sensitive and specific marker for sex cord-stromal tumors of the ovary. Am J Surg Pathol 2011;35:484-94.
D'Angelo E, Mozos A, Nakayama D, Espinosa I, Catasus L, Munoz J, et al
. Prognostic significance of FOXL2 mutation and mRNA expression in adult and juvenile granulosa cell tumors of the ovary. Mod Pathol 2011;24:1360-7.
Gershon R, Aviel-Ronen S, Korach J, Daniel-Carmi V, Avivi C, Bar-Ilan D, et al
. FOXL2 C402G mutation detection using MALDI-TOF-MS in DNA extracted from Israeli granulosa cell tumors. Gynecol Oncol 2011;122:580-4.
Shah SP, Kobel M, Senz J, Morin RD, Clarke BA, Wiegand KC, et al
. Mutation of FOXL2 in granulosa-cell tumors of the ovary. N Engl J Med 2009;360:2719-29.
Fleming NI, Knower KC, Lazarus KA, Fuller PJ, Simpson ER, Clyne CD. Aromatase is a direct target of FOXL2: C134W in granulosa cell tumors via a single highly conserved binding site in the ovarian specific promoter. PloS One 2010;5:e14389.
Benayoun BA, Georges AB, L'Hote D, Andersson N, Dipietromaria A, Todeschini AL, et al
. Transcription factor FOXL2 protects granulosa cells from stress and delays cell cycle: Role of its regulation by the SIRT1 deacetylase. Hum Mol Genet 2011;20:1673-86.
Verdin H, De Baere E. FOXL2 impairment in human disease. Horm Res Paediatr 2012;77:2-11.
Lima JF, Jin L, de Araujo AR, Erikson-Johnson MR, Oliveira AM, Sebo TJ, et al
. FOXL2 mutations in granulosa cell tumors occurring in males. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2012;136:825-8.
Kalfa N, Fellous M, Boizet-Bonhoure B, Patte C, Duvillard P, Pienkowski C, et al
. Aberrant expression of ovary determining gene FOXL2 in the testis and juvenile granulosa cell tumor in children. J Urol 2008; 180 (4 Suppl):1810-3.
Chaboissier MC, Kobayashi A, Vidal VI, Lutzkendorf S, van de Kant HJ, Wegner M, et al
. Functional analysis of Sox8 and Sox9 during sex determination in the mouse. Development 2004;131:1891-901.
Gasca S, Canizares J, De Santa Barbara P, Mejean C, Poulat F, Berta P, et al
. A nuclear export signal within the high mobility group domain regulates the nucleocytoplasmic translocation of SOX9 during sexual determination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:11199-204.
de Santa Barbara P, Moniot B, Poulat F, Berta P. Expression and subcellular localization of SF-1, SOX9, WT1, and AMH proteins during early human testicular development. Dev Dyn 2000;217:293-8.
Pangas SA, Li X, Umans L, Zwijsen A, Huylebroeck D, Gutierrez C, et al
. Conditional deletion of Smad1 and Smad5 in somatic cells of male and female gonads leads to metastatic tumor development in mice. Mol Cell Biol 2008;28:248-57.
Shukla AR, Huff DS, Canning DA, Filmer RB, Snyder HM 3 rd
, Carpintieri D, et al
. Juvenile granulosa cell tumor of the testis: Contemporary clinical management and pathological diagnosis. J Urol 2004;171: 1900-2.
Cecchetto G, Alaggio R, Bisogno G, Virgone C, Dall'Igna P, Terenziani M, et al
. Sex cord-stromal tumors of the testis in children. A clinicopathologic report from the Italian TREP project. J Pediatr Surg 2010;45:1868-73.
Bulotta AL, Molinaro F, Angotti R, Ferrara F, Di Maggio G, Bindi E, et al
. Juvenile granulosa cell tumor of the testis: Prenatal diagnosis and prescrotal approach. Ital J Pediatr 2012;38:67.
Arzola J, Hutton RL, Baughman SM, Mora RV. Adult-type testicular granulosa cell tumor: Case report and review of the literature. Urology 2006;68:1121.e13-6.
Ditonno P, Lucarelli G, Battaglia M, Mancini V, Palazzo S, Trabucco S, et al
. Testicular granulosa cell tumor of adult type: A new case and a review of the literature. Urol Oncol 2007;25:322-5.
Hisano M, Souza FM, Malheiros DM, Pompeo AC, Lucon AM. Granulosa cell tumor of the adult testis: Report of a case and review of the literature. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2006;61:77-8.
Lopez JI. Adult-type granulosa cell tumor of the testis. Report of a case. Tumori 2007;93:223-4.
Gupta A, Mathur SK, Reddy CP, Arora B. Testicular granulosa cell tumor, adult type. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2008;51:405-6.
Lin KH, Lin SE, Lee LM. Juvenile granulosa cell tumor of adult testis: A case report. Urology 2008;72:230.e11-3.
Dudani R, Giordano L, Sultania P, Jha K, Florens A, Joseph T. Juvenile granulosa cell tumor of testis: Case report and review of literature. Am J Perinatol 2008;25:229-31.
Peterson C, Skoog S. Prenatal diagnosis of juvenile granulosa cell tumor of the testis. J Pediatr Urol 2008;4:472-4.
Seixas-Mikelus SA, Khan A, Williot PE, Greenfield SP. Three-month-old boy with juvenile granulosa cell tumor of testis and ossifying renal tumor of infancy. Urology 2009;74:311-3.
Gun F, Erginel B, Klcaslan I, Anak S, Ziylan O, Celik A. A rare neonatal testicular tumor: Juvenile granulosa cell tumor of infant testis: A report of 3 cases. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2010;32:e158-9.
Zugor V, Labanaris AP, Witt J, Seidler A, Weingartner K, Schott GE. Congenital juvenile granulosa cell tumor of the testis in newborns. Anticancer Res 2010;30:1731-4.
Bujons A, Sfulcini JC, Pascual M, Feu OA, Garat JM, Villavicencio H. Prepubertal testicular tumours and efficacy of testicular preserving surgery. BJU Int 2011;107:1812-6.
Hanson JA, Ambaye AB. Adult testicular granulosa cell tumor: A review of the literature for clinicopathologic predictors of malignancy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2011;135:143-6.
Song Z, Vaughn DJ, Bing Z. Adult type granulosa cell tumor in adult testis: Report of a case and review of the literature. Rare Tumors 2011;3:e37.
Couture J, Bolduc S. A rare testicular solid mass in children: Juvenile granulosa cell tumour of testis. Can Urol Assoc J 2012;6:E101-3.
Partalis N, Tzardi M, Barbagadakis S, Sakellaris G. Juvenile granulosa cell tumor arising from intra-abdominal testis in newborn: Case report and review of the literature. Urology 2012;79:1152-4.
Dimosthenis M, Eleftherios A, Ioannis M. Adult type granulosa cell tumor: A very rare case of sex-cord tumor of the testis with review of the literature. Case Rep Pathol 2013;2013:932086.
Department of Pathology, 8th Floor, Annexe Building, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr. Ernest Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai - 400 012, Maharashtra
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Adult-Type Granulosa Cell Tumor of the Testis: A Report of a Case and a Discussion of the Literature
| ||Georgios Zervopoulos, Nikolaos Mitsimponas, Filippos Venetsanos, Athanasios Papathanasis |
| ||Uro. 2023; 3(3): 177 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Adult Granulosa Cell Tumor of the Testis: A Case Report with a Review of the Literature
| ||Klaus-Peter Dieckmann,Julia Bertolini,Christian Wülfing |
| ||Case Reports in Urology. 2019; 2019: 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Rare urologic tumors
| ||Barrett McCormick,Aaron Dahmen,Ali Antar,Adam Baumgarten,Jasreman Dhillon,Philippe E. Spiess |
| ||Current Opinion in Urology. 2017; 27(1): 68 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Juvenile Granulosa Cell Tumors of the Testis
| ||Chia-Sui Kao,Kristine M. Cornejo,Thomas M. Ulbright,Robert H. Young |
| ||The American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2015; 39(9): 1159 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||7080 |
| Printed||194 |
| Emailed||2 |
| PDF Downloaded||307 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
| Cited by others ||4 |